1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 391 F.3d
  5. 391 F.3d 63 (2004)
 

ROSE v. AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA

Docket No. 04-0389-CV.

391 F.3d 63 (2004)

Mark S. ROSE and Frederic G. Rose, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AMSOUTH BANK OF FLORIDA, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

Decided: December 1, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald R. Hamill (William R. Garbarino, of counsel), Law Office of William R. Garbarino, Sayville, NY, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.

Robert J. Ansell (Jay S. Hellman, of counsel), Silverman Perlstein & Acampora LLP, Jericho, NY, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: CARDAMONE, CABRANES, and SOTOMAYOR, Circuit Judges.

JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge.

In this diversity action, plaintiffs Mark S. Rose and Frederic G. Rose (the "Roses") appeal from the December 17, 2003 judgment of the District Court finding the Roses' 1986 assignment of a life insurance policy subordinate to defendant AmSouth Bank's ("AmSouth") 1997 assignment of the same policy. Though the District Court found that plaintiffs had a valid assignment under New York law, the Court concluded that plaintiffs were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases