McCLUNG v. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPT.

No. S121568.

20 Cal.Rptr.3d 428 (2004)

34 Cal.4th 467

99 P.3d 1015

Lesli Ann McCLUNG, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

November 4, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Law Offices of Guy D. Loranger, Guy D. Loranger; and Shelley Gregory, San Francisco, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, James M. Schiavenza, Louis R. Mauro, Barton R. Jenks and Diana L. Cuomo, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent Employment Development Department.

Matheny Sears Linkert & Long, Michael A. Bishop and Roger Yang, Sacramento, for Defendant and Respondent Manuel Lopez.


CHIN, J.

"It is, emphatically, the province and duty of the judicial department, to say what the law is. Those who apply the rule to particular cases, must of necessity expound and interpret that rule." (Marbury v. Madison (1803) 1 Cranch 137, 5 U.S. 137, 177, 2 L.Ed. 60.)

This basic principle is at issue in this case. In Carrisales v. Department of Corrections ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases