1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. B.R.
  4. 309 B.R.
  5. 309 B.R. 111 (2004)
 

IN RE INSILCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

No. 02-13672(KJC).

309 B.R. 111 (2004)

In re INSILCO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Debtors.

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware.

April 8, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alfred Villoch, III, Maureen D. Luke, Pauline K. Morgan, Sharon M. Zieg, Young, Conway, Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, Wilmington, DE, Jack R. Pigman, Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, PLL, Columbus, OH, Warren T. Pratt, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Debtor.

David L. Buchbinder, Office of U.S. Trustee, Wilmington, DE, U.S. Trustee.

Schuyler G. Carroll, Arent, Fox, Kintner, Plotkin & Kahn, New York City, for pro se.

Andrew I. Silfen, Arent Fox, PLLC, New York City, David P. Primack, Michael George Phillips, Warren T. Pratt, Drinker, Biddle & Reath, LLP, Wilmington, DE, for Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors.

MEMORANDUM1

KEVIN J. CAREY, Bankruptcy Judge.

Insilco Technologies, Inc. and its affiliated debtors, as debtors and debtors in possession in the above-captioned matter (collectively "the Debtors"), filed their Third Omnibus Substantive Objection to Requests for Payment of Administrative Expenses ("the Objection"). The Debtors assert in their memorandum of law in support of the Objection that the claims of New York State...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases