1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 270 Wis.2d
  5. 270 Wis.2d 55 (2004)
 

HOYME v. BRAKKEN

No. 02-1790.

270 Wis.2d 55 (2004)

2004 WI 26

677 N.W.2d 233

Steven H. HOYME, Petitioner-Respondent, v. Janice S. BRAKKEN, Respondent-Appellant-Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided March 25, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the respondent-appellant-petitioner there were briefs by Donald R. Fraker and Fraker Law Firm, S.C., Mequon, and oral argument by Donald R. Fraker.

For the petitioner-respondent there was a brief by Janis M. Burgess and Wesley W. Hoffman & Associates, P.C., Menominee, MI, and oral argument by Janis M. Burgess.

¶ 1. PER CURIAM.

The court is equally divided on the question of whether the decision of the court of appeals, Hoyme v. Brakken, No. 02-1790, unpublished slip op. (Wis. Ct. App. July 22, 2003), should be affirmed or reversed. Justice JON P. WILCOX, Justice N. PATRICK CROOKS, and Justice DAVID T. PROSSER would affirm; Chief Justice SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, Justice ANN WALSH BRADLEY, and Justice PATIENCE D. ROGGENSACK would reverse. Justice DIANE S. SYKES...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases