1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 17 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 17 Cal.Rptr.3d 289 (2004)
 

REEVES v. HANLON

No. S114811.

17 Cal.Rptr.3d 289 (2004)

95 P.3d 513

33 Cal.4th 1140

Robert L. REEVES et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Daniel P. HANLON et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of California.

August 12, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dwyer, Daly, Brotzen & Bruno, Toni Rae Bruno, Los Angeles, Marlin D. Wall and Ilan A. Charnelle, for Defendants and Appellants.

Deborah J. La Fetra, Sacramento, and Timothy Sandefur, Rialto, for Pacific Legal Foundation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Defendants and Appellants.

Ballard, Rosenberg, Golper & Savitt, John J. Manier, Linda C. Miller Savitt, Universal City; Arter & Hadden, David Gurnick, Sue Bendavid-Arbiv; Robert L. Reeves & Associates, Robert L. Reeves, Robert J. DuPont, Pasadena, and Richard M. Wilner, Long Beach, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

BAXTER, J.

The primary issue presented is whether a defendant may be held liable under an intentional interference theory for having induced an at-will employee to quit working for the plaintiff. Because an interference as such is primarily an interference with the future relation between the plaintiff and the at-will employee, we hold that inducing the termination of an at-will employment relation may be actionable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases