The United States (the "government") appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of International Trade granting summary judgment in favor of Intercontinental Marble ("ICM"), thereby reversing the classification by the United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection ("Customs") of certain merchandise imported by ICM. Intercont'l Marble Corp. v. United States,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
INTERCONTINENTAL MARBLE CORP. v. U.S.
No. 03-1555.
381 F.3d 1169 (2004)
INTERCONTINENTAL MARBLE CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellant.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 25, 2004.
August 25, 2004.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Harry A. Valetk, Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, International Trade Field Office, United States Department of Justice, of New York, NY, argued for defendant-appellant. With him on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General and David M. Cohen, Director, of Washington, DC; and Barbara S. Williams, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, of New York, NY. Of counsel on the brief was Chi S. Choy, United States Customs & Border Protection, of New York, NY.
Before LOURIE, GAJARSA, and PROST, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
