1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 838 A.2d
  5. 838 A.2d 494 (2004)
 

EAST BRUNSWICK v. EAST MILL ASSOC. INC.

838 A.2d 494 (2004)

365 N.J. Super. 120

EAST BRUNSWICK SEWERAGE AUTHORITY, a public body politic and corporation of the Township of East Brunswick, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EAST MILL ASSOCIATES, INC., A New Jersey limited partnership, Jack Whitman, individually and as general partner, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 2, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karl P. Kemm, North Brunswick, argued the cause for appellants (Philibosian, Russell, Killmurray & Kinneally, attorneys; Mr. Kemm and Christina E. Jones Rowe, on the brief).

James E. Stahl, North Brunswick, argued the cause for respondents (Borrus, Goldin, Foley, Vignuolo, Hyman & Stahl, attorneys; Mr. Stahl, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, LINTNER and LISA.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This case involves the allocation of costs associated with the upgrade of a sewer pumping station. The defendant, East Mills Associates (EMA), was developing residential units within the East Brunswick Sewerage Authority's (EBSA) service area. The sewer pumping system required an upgrade to accommodate the new units being built by the defendants.

In the developer's agreement, EMA agreed to pay 55% of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases