1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 373 F.3d
  5. 373 F.3d 786 (2004)
 

AUTOZONE, INC. v. TANDY CORP.

No. 01-6571.

373 F.3d 786 (2004)

AUTOZONE, INC. and Speedbar, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TANDY CORP., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed June 29, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alan S. Cooper (argued and briefed), Shaw Pittman, Washington, DC, Robb S. Harvey (briefed), Waller, Lansden, Dortch & Davis, Nashville, TN, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Douglas R. Pierce (briefed), King & Ballow, Nashville, TN, Jane Michaels (argued and briefed), Holland & Hart, Denver, CO, Timothy P. Getzoff (briefed), Holland & Hart, Boulder, CO, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before: BATCHELDER and MOORE, Circuit Judges; CALDWELL, District Judge.

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

This case springs from a trademark dispute between two large nationwide retailers in the seemingly disparate markets of automotive parts and electronics. Plaintiff-Appellant AutoZone, Inc. ("AutoZone") is a nationwide retailer of consumer automotive products that uses the mark AUTOZONE. AutoZone and its wholly owned subsidiary Speedbar, Inc. brought an action against Defendant-Appellee Tandy Corporation ("Tandy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases