DAVIS v. HALL

Nos. 02-3923, 02-3924, 03-1343.

375 F.3d 703 (2004)

Daryl L. DAVIS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calzona HALL, Ex-Director, St. Louis County Department of Justice Services, in his individual capacity; Dora B. Schriro, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, in her individual capacity; Robert A. Meechum, Lieutenant; Jacqueline D. Young; St. Louis County; Brian Goeke; Larry Wilson; Susan Martin; Stacy Breedon; John Prier; Travis Clyburn, Defendants, Barbara Knell; Rebecca Atterberry, Defendants-Appellants, Pat Roll, Defendant. Daryl L. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Calzona Hall, Ex-Director, St. Louis County Department of Justice Services, in his individual capacity; Dora B. Schriro, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, in her individual capacity; Robert A. Meechum, Lieutenant; Jacqueline D. Young; St. Louis County; Brian Goeke; Larry Wilson, Defendants, Susan Martin; Stacy Breedon; John Prier; Travis Clyburn, Defendants-Appellants, Barbara Knell; Rebecca Atterberry; Pat Roll, Defendants. Daryl L. Davis, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Calzona Hall, Ex-Director, St. Louis County Department of Justice Services, in his individual capacity; Dora B. Schriro, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, in her individual capacity; Robert A. Meechum, Lieutenant; Jacqueline D. Young; St. Louis County; Brian Goeke; Larry Wilson,; Susan Martin; Stacy Breedon; John Prier; Travis Clyburn; Barbara Knell; Rebecca Atterberry; Pat Roll, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Filed: July 14, 2004.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied September 21, 2004.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maureen C. Beekley, argued, Asst. Attorney General, St. Louis, MO (Denise Garrison McElvein, on the brief), for Appellants.

W. Bevis Schock, argued, St. Louis, MO, for Appellee Davis.

Robert E. Fox, Jr., argued, Clayton, MO, for Appellees C. Hall, et al.

Before RILEY, RICHARD S. ARNOLD, and MELLOY, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 21, 2004.*

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

These interlocutory appeals follow the district court's disposition of the defendants' motions for summary judgment on Daryl Davis's § 1983 claims alleging due process violations in connection with his prolonged incarceration after he was ordered released. For the reasons stated below, we affirm in part and reverse in part.

I. FACTUAL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases