Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the court deprived him of the right to be present during a replay of his videotaped statement which had been requested by the jury during its deliberation. However, the defendant failed to satisfy his burden of coming forward with substantial evidence to rebut the presumption of regularity which attaches to all criminal proceedings (see People v Andrew,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.