1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.3d
  4. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d
  5. 8 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2003)
 

DURAN v. ST. LUKE'S HOSP.

No. A102182.

8 Cal.Rptr.3d 1 (2003)

114 Cal.App.4th 457

Celina DURAN et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. ST. LUKE'S HOSPITAL et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

Review Denied March 17, 2004.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth M. Sigelman & Associates, Kenneth M. Sigelman, Penelope A. Phillips, San Diego, for Appellants.

Hassard Bonnington, James M. Goodman, B. Thomas French, Rebecca L. Cachia-Riedl, San Francisco, for Respondent St. Luke's Hospital.

Galloway, Lucchese & Everson, Patrick Galloway, Maureen H. Loftis, Walnut Creek, for Respondent Vicki Cordts.

Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols, Gerhard O. Winkler, San Francisco, for Respondent Women's Health Center.

KAY, P.J.

Benjamin Franklin described the snowballing consequences of inattention to a small detail — "For want of a nail, the shoe was lost; for want of a shoe the horse was lost; and for want of a horse the rider was lost." (Oxford Dict. of Quotations (2d ed.1955) p. 211.) In this case the missing nail is a check that was $3 short of the amount required to file a complaint for medical malpractice that allegedly caused the death of the plaintiffs' infant child...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases