While the defendant is entitled by statute to have his counsel deliver a summation at the close of all the evidence (see CPL 260.30 [8]; Herring v New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. ROMANO
301 A.D.2d 666 (2003)
753 N.Y.S.2d 873
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ANTHONY ROMANO, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided January 27, 2003.
Decided January 27, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.