Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
The Supreme Court properly determined that the petitioner did not need an area variance to construct a temporary tennis bubble over two of its tennis courts. It is undisputed that the elevation of the bubble conforms to the height limitations contained in the relevant zoning ordinance (cf. Matter of Petrocelli v Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Vil. of Kings Point,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.