1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 129 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 129 Cal.Rptr.2d 741 (2003)
 

PRATT v. VENCOR, INC.

No. F038462.

129 Cal.Rptr.2d 741 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 905

Sally M. PRATT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. VENCOR, INC., et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

January 27, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gianunzio & DeSantis and Victor Gianunzio, Oakland, for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Jackson, Lewis, Schnitzler & Krupman, D. Gregory Valenza, Sacramento, and Tyler A. Brown, San Francisco, for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

WISEMAN, J.

This case is like a bottle of fine California Chardonnay—very dry. It addresses a purely procedural question of the "trigger date" for the commencement of the 60-day time period within which the court must rule on a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) when there is no corresponding motion for a new trial. We publish to resolve the contention that there is ambiguity in the language of Code of Civil Procedure sections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases