Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs to the respondents appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
The individual petitioners did not meet their burden of establishing their standing to sue. They failed to indicate how the proposed land uses would cause them an injury in fact, different from that suffered by the public at large, within the zone of interest that the State Environmental Quality Review Act (see ECL art 8) is intended...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
