PRENDERGAST v. PATEL


301 A.D.2d 508 (2003)

753 N.Y.S.2d 382

MARY PRENDERGAST et al., Appellants, v. MUKUND R. PATEL et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided January 13, 2003.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly precluded their counsel from questioning the defendant Mukund R. Patel about a January 4, 1994, postoperative report he allegedly authored, and properly refused to allow the report to be offered into evidence. A trial court has broad discretion to limit cross-examination when questions are not relevant to the case or concern...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases