1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 660 N.W.2d
  5. 660 N.W.2d 140 (2003)
 

IN RE THULIN

No. C0-02-2033.

660 N.W.2d 140 (2003)

In re Bengt Val THULIN.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

April 29, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Tim Aldrich, Grand Rapids, MN, for appellant Thulin.

John J. Muhar, Itasca County Attorney, Mary Evenhouse, Assistant County Attorney, Grand Rapids, MN, for respondent county.

Considered and decided by HARTEN, Presiding Judge, PETERSON, Judge, and HALBROOKS, Judge.

OPINION

HALBROOKS, Judge.

Appellant contends that (1) the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider his continued commitment because his initial commitment was being appealed to this court; (2) the court did not have clear and convincing evidence that he posed the requisite likelihood of harm under Minn.Stat. § 253B.02, subd. 13 (2002); (3) less restrictive treatment alternatives were available; and (4) there was no clear and convincing evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases