PALMER v. GTE CALIFORNIA, INC.

No. S104997.

135 Cal.Rptr.2d 654 (2003)

30 Cal.4th 1265

70 P.3d 1067

Debbie PALMER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GTE CALIFORNIA, INC., Defendant and Appellant.

Supreme Court of California.

June 26, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sullivan, Sottile & Taketa, Mark Sullivan, Westlake Village, Timothy B. Sottile, Donn S. Taketa, Thousands Oaks; Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker, Paul Grossman, George W. Abele and Heather A. Morgan, Los Angeles, for Defendant and Appellant.

Law Offices of Kerry R. Tepper, Kerry R. Tepper, Thousands Oaks; Law Offices of Louis E. Goebel and Louis E. Goebel, San Diego, for Plaintiff and Appellant.


KENNARD, J.

Motions for a new trial or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict are subject to strict time limits that begin to run when the party seeking such relief is served with a written notice of entry of judgment. (Code Civ. Proc, §§ 629, 659, 660.)1 A party intending to move for a new trial or for judgment notwithstanding the verdict must do so within 15 days of such service. (§§ 659, 629.)

Is the statutory...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases