Defendant, charged with committing a robbery in a subway, raised the affirmative defense of insanity. Although defendant's trial attorney retained a psychiatrist to offer expert testimony in support of the defense and announced his intention to offer psychiatric testimony in his opening statement at trial, the attorney ultimately did not call the psychiatrist to testify. Instead, the attorney offered defendant's own testimony and the records of his psychiatric treatment to...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
