FISCO v. PROVIDENT WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY


303 A.D.2d 451 (2003)

755 N.Y.S.2d 893

ROBERT FISCO, Appellant, v. PROVIDENT WASHINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided March 10, 2003.


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is denied, and the complaint is reinstated.

The plaintiff argues that the defendant insurer had a duty to provide him with notice of its disclaimer. Further, since the defendant failed to serve the plaintiff with a notice of disclaimer, under Insurance Law § 3420 (d) it is now estopped from disclaiming coverage. Insurance Law § 3420 (d) requires an insurer disclaiming liability to give...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases