HOLTERMAN v. HOLTERMAN


307 A.D.2d 442 (2003)

762 N.Y.S.2d 152

AMY N. HOLTERMAN, Respondent, v. ROBERT K. HOLTERMAN, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

Decided July 3, 2003.


Mugglin, J.

On this appeal defendant claims error with the monetary aspects of equitable distribution, maintenance, child support, life insurance and fees. First, defendant claims that the rationale in Brough v Brough (285 A.D.2d 913 [2001]) should be applied here and plaintiff's share of that portion of his enhanced earnings that is marital property should be limited to 10%. We disagree. Although we recognize that defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases