1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 324 F.3d
  5. 324 F.3d 401 (2003)
 

U.S. v. FINKLEY

Nos. 01-1646, 01-1891.

324 F.3d 401 (2003)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard FINKLEY (01-1646) and William Halliburton (01-1891), Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: April 1, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David J. Debold (briefed), Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Plaintiff-Appellee, U.S.

John L. Belanger (briefed), Sterling Heights, MI, for Defendant-Appellant, Richard E. Finkley.

William W. Swor, Detroit, MI, for Defendant-Appellant, William D. Halliburton.

William D. Halliburton, Detroit, MI, pro se.

Before COLE, GILMAN, and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Richard Finkley and William Halliburton were convicted of conspiracy to defraud the United States. Halliburton was also convicted on numerous substantive counts for making fraudulent claims against the government. On appeal, Halliburton challenges the sentencing enhancement that he received for being a manager of the conspiracy. In addition, Finkley and Halliburton both challenge the amount of restitution that they were ordered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases