MELA v. GENTILE


306 A.D.2d 388 (2003)

761 N.Y.S.2d 482

ALBERT MELA, Respondent, v. VITO GENTILE, Appellant, et al., Defendant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 16, 2003.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of his motion for summary judgment, the defendant submitted proof in evidentiary form which demonstrated that the plaintiff's injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see Gaddy v Eyler, 79 N.Y.2d 955 [1992]). In opposition, the plaintiff submitted an affirmation from his treating physician which designated a numeric percentage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases