MEADE v. HISLER


306 A.D.2d 387 (2003)

760 N.Y.S.2d 891

SUSAN MEADE, Appellant, v. STUART HISLER, Respondent, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 16, 2003.


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The plaintiff's contention that the Supreme Court should have reinstructed the jury on the issue of proximate cause after it returned an initial inconsistent verdict is not preserved for appellate review (see CPLR 4110-b; Smith v J.C. Penney Co., 300 A.D.2d 466 [2002]; Doyle v Nusser, 288 A.D.2d 176 [2001]; Alfano v Arthur...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases