KARL-ERBO GRAF VON KAGENECK v. COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE


301 A.D.2d 363 (2003)

752 N.Y.S.2d 852

KARL-ERBO GRAF VON KAGENECK et al., Respondents, v. COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE et al., Appellants.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided January 7, 2003.


Where resolution of plaintiffs' allegations of malpractice revolves around analysis and application of patent law, subject matter jurisdiction lies exclusively in the federal courts (see 28 USC § 1338 [a]; see also Christianson v Colt Indus., 486 U.S. 800, 808-809; U.S. Valves, Inc. v Dray, 212 F.3d 1368; Franchi v Manbeck, 947 F.2d 631). Contrary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases