DUBINSKY v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION


303 A.D.2d 318 (2003)

758 N.Y.S.2d 18

MELVIN DUBINSKY, Appellant, v. AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided March 27, 2003.


Assuming, arguendo, that the March 1999 letter to plaintiff was a binding agreement, it did not obligate defendants to assign him any specific number of claims for review. Prudential was justified in advising the American Arbitration Association (AAA) that plaintiff had been removed as a claims appeals reviewer pursuant to the manual governing the class action settlement, which provided for termination of an appeals reviewer's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases