The court's finding was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. The element of recklessness required under the assault and reckless endangerment counts was established beyond a reasonable doubt. The evidence warranted the conclusion that, when appellant removed the magazine from a pistol, pointed the pistol in the complaining witness's general direction and squeezed the trigger, causing a chambered round to strike the complaining...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.