1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 306 A.D.2d
  5. 306 A.D.2d 295 (2003)
 

PEOPLE v. RAMOS

306 A.D.2d 295 (2003)

760 N.Y.S.2d 331

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FERDINAND RAMOS, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 2, 2003.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the Supreme Court committed reversible error in permitting the jury foreperson to take notes during the supplemental charge without providing cautionary instructions to the jury is unpreserved for appellate review because he did not object to the note-taking, nor did he request that the jurors be instructed (see People v Stewart, 179 A.D.2d 731, 732 [1992...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases