There is no indication that a deliberating juror's impending airline flight had any effect on his ability to deliberate and render a verdict fairly and impartially. Jury deliberations continued past the scheduled time of the juror's flight, and the jury ultimately reached a verdict without incident. Defendant's claim that the impending flight had affected the juror's ability to reach a verdict is conjectural (cf. People v Agosto,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. MARCHENA
303 A.D.2d 295 (2003)
759 N.Y.S.2d 3
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. JESUS MARCHENA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided March 25, 2003.
Decided March 25, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.