PAUL v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY


306 A.D.2d 260 (2003)

760 N.Y.S.2d 345

JUDITH PAUL et al., Appellants, v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING COMPANY et al., Respondents.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

Decided June 2, 2003.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

A motion for leave to renew should be denied unless the moving party offers a reasonable justification as to why the new facts were not submitted on the prior motion (see CPLR 2221 [e]; Palmer v Toledo, 266 A.D.2d 268 [1999]). The plaintiffs failed to offer a reasonable justification for their failure to submit the subsequent affidavits of the injured plaintiff's treating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases