Defendant did not preserve his contention that he was deprived of his right to address the court prior to the imposition of sentence, as provided by CPL 380.50 (1), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Were we to review this claim, we would find that the court sufficiently complied with the statute (see People v McClain,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.