The IAS court erred in finding as a matter of law that plaintiff's hiring was for a definite one-year period, rather than at will, in light of the contradictory evidence, including plaintiff's affidavit, the deposition testimony of the parties and the letter agreement dated October 27, 1999. Although it appears that plaintiff's negotiated salary was to be $165,000 per year, it is unclear whether this figure was a guarantee of employment for one year or merely represents a...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
