1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 105 S.W.3d
  5. 105 S.W.3d 369 (2003)
 

ADDINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

No. CA 02-626.

105 S.W.3d 369 (2003)

Gene ADDINGTON v. WAL-MART STORES, INC.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II.

April 23, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Odom & Elliott, by: Bobby Lee Odom and Conrad T. Odom, Fayetteville; and Ray Bunch, Rogers, for appellant.

Matthews, Campbell, Rhoads, McClure, Thompson & Fryauf, P.A., by: David R. Matthews and George R. Rhoads, Rogers, for appellee.

JOSEPHINE LINKER HART, Judge.

In this case from Benton County, the trial court granted summary judgment to Wal-Mart on five causes of action brought against it by appellant Gene Addington, a former employee: 1) the tort of outrage; 2) false-light invasion of privacy; 3) intrusion invasion of privacy; 4) defamation; and 5) negligence. Addington argues that summary judgment was inappropriate because genuine issues of material fact remain on each count. We affirm the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases