HETOS INVESTMENTS, LTD. v. KURTIN

No. G031852.

1 Cal.Rptr.3d 472 (2003)

110 Cal.App.4th 36

HETOS INVESTMENTS, LTD., et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. Todd KURTIN, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

Review Denied September 17, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Voss, Cook & Thel, Francis T. Donohue III, Daniel S. Miller, Los Angeles; Law Offices of Richard E. Flamm and Richard E. Flamm, Berkeley, for Defendant and Appellant.

Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, Brian L. Behmer, San Diego, Timothy S. Blackford and Stanley J. Panikowski, for Plaintiffs and Respondents.


OPINION

MOORE, J.

After a real estate transaction went awry, the parties thereto, represented by separate counsel, entered into a settlement agreement. Later, one of the parties agreed to advance settlement monies to another of the parties, but did not want to incur legal fees in connection with the documentation of the loan. Consequently, the borrower asked his law firm to prepare a promissory note documenting the terms to which he and the lender had already...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases