The motion court correctly dismissed plaintiff's causes of action for breach of contract on the ground that the parties' 1998 letter agreement, which purported to settle plaintiff's claims for extra work performed pursuant to the parties' 1993 contract, is not separately enforceable in a court action, but rather is subject to the alternate dispute resolution procedures contained in the 1993 contract. Insofar as pertinent, the letter agreement, after resolving the extra time...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.