The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion without holding a Mapp/Dunaway hearing. Although the People's voluntary disclosure form clearly indicated that the predicate for defendant's arrest was an officer's observation of an apparent drug transaction, which was described in detail, defendant's moving papers failed to address this information (see People v Jones,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VARGAS
306 A.D.2d 163 (2003)
760 N.Y.S.2d 326
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. FERNANDO VARGAS, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided June 19, 2003.
Decided June 19, 2003.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
