BARRY v. LINDNER

No. 38177.

75 P.3d 388 (2003)

Jeffrey A. BARRY, Appellant, v. Robyn LINDNER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

August 29, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey Friedman, Reno, for Appellant.

Skinner, Watson & Rounds and Gregory S. Skinner, Reno, for Respondent.

Before ROSE, MAUPIN and GIBBONS, JJ.


OPINION

PER CURIAM:

As the primary issues of this appeal, we consider whether telephonic testimony is permitted at trial and whether the district court correctly imputed income to Jeffrey Barry. We hold that telephonic testimony is only permissible under special circumstances and conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it imputed income to Barry.

FACTS

On May 16, 1993, Barry and Robyn Lindner were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases