The court properly admitted tapes of 911 calls from unidentified callers under the present sense impression exception to the hearsay rule. At trial, defendant conceded that these tapes met the requirements of that hearsay exception but objected on the ground of improper rebuttal, a theory not pursued on appeal, and not having been able to cross-examine the callers. We find no constitutional violation. Aside from whether the present sense impression exception is "firmly rooted...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
