The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. Issues of identification and credibility were properly considered by the jury and there is no basis for disturbing its determinations.
Since defendant requested no further relief after the court struck the offending testimony and delivered a curative instruction, his bolstering claim is unpreserved (see People v Medina,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.