1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 305 A.D.2d
  5. 305 A.D.2d 135 (2003)
 

PEOPLE v. SPIVEY

305 A.D.2d 135 (2003)

759 N.Y.S.2d 456

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. ERIK SPIVEY, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

Decided May 6, 2003.

The challenged summation remarks were legitimate responses to the defense summation. Rather than asserting his personal belief in the credibility of his witnesses, the prosecutor made fair arguments as to why these witnesses should be believed and as to why defendant's attacks on their credibility should be rejected. Therefore, there was no impermissible "vouching" (People v Overlee, 236 A.D.2d 133, 144 [1997], lv denied 91...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases