1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.3d
  4. 139 S.W.3d
  5. 139 S.W.3d 150 (2003)
 

CEOLA v. BURNHAM

No. CA 03-574.

139 S.W.3d 150 (2003)

84 Ark.App. 269

Wade Matthew CEOLA v. Ashley (Ceola) BURNHAM.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas, Division II.

December 17, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hilburn, Calhoon, Harper, Pruniski & Calhoon, Ltd., by: Sam Hilburn and Traci LaCerra, North Little Rock, for appellant.

Peel Law Firm, P.A., by: Richard L. Peel and Jennifer L. Modersohn, Russellville, for appellee.

SAM BIRD, Judge.

Wade Matthew Ceola brings this appeal contending that the court abused its discretion by following the child-support guidelines and ordering him to pay a percentage of his salary as child support. Ceola's income exceeds the amount of income shown on the family-support chart, and, pursuant to In Re: Administrative Order No. 10, Arkansas Child Support Guidelines, 347 Ark. 1064 (2002), he was ordered to pay 15 percent of his monthly income in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases