WALSH CONST. CO. v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW

0104-03398; A117368.

76 P.3d 164 (2003)

189 Or. App. 400

WALSH CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellant, v. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Chaney, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Patrick A. Lynd and Jaqua & Wheatley, P.C.

Thomas M. Christ, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Cosgrave Vergeer Kester LLP.

Before HASELTON, Presiding Judge, and LINDER and WOLLHEIM, Judges.


HASELTON, P.J.

Plaintiff Walsh Construction Company (WCC) appeals from a judgment for defendant Mutual of Enumclaw on plaintiff's claim for breach of an insurance contract. As described below, we conclude that, because of the operation of ORS 30.140(1), defendant had no duty either to defend or to indemnify plaintiff. Accordingly, we affirm.

The material facts are not in dispute. Plaintiff, a general contractor, entered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases