1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 319 F.3d
  5. 319 F.3d 1357 (2003)
 

INTEL CORP. v. VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Nos. 02-1212, 02-1213.

319 F.3d 1357 (2003)

INTEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a California Corporation, VIA Technologies, Inc., a Taiwan Corporation, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 14, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Matthew D. Powers, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, LLP, of Redwood Shores, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Jared Bobrow and Perry R. Clark. Of counsel on the brief was James F. Valentine, Howrey, Simon, Arnold & White, LLP, of Menlo Park, CA.

Robert P. Feldman, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, CA, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Rodney G. Strickland, Jr. and Maura L. Rees.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, MICHEL, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judges.

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Intel Corporation ("Intel") appeals the December 13, 2001, decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, Intel Corp. v. VIA Techs., Inc., C-99-03062 (N.D.Cal. Dec. 13, 2001), entering summary judgment of noninfringement for the accused infringers, VIA Technologies, Inc., California and Taiwan (collectively "VIA"), on the ground that VIA was licensed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases