1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 344 F.3d
  5. 344 F.3d 1234 (2003)
 

AK STEEL CORP. v. SOLLAC AND UGINE

Nos. 03-1074, 03-1075, 03-1085, 03-1086.

344 F.3d 1234 (2003)

AK STEEL CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SOLLAC and UGINE, Defendants-Cross Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

September 23, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David E. Schmit, Frost Brown Todd LLC, of Cincinnati, Ohio, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Ann G. Robinson.

Steven P. Weihrouch, Oblon, Spivak, McCelland, Maier, & Neustadt, P.C., of Alexandria, Virginia, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were Steven E. Lipman, Jean-Paul Lavalleye, Stephen G. Baxter, Michael E. McCabe, Jr., and Clayton W. Thompson, II.

Before LOURIE, CLEVENGER, and RADER, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge LOURIE. Concurring opinion filed by Circuit Judge RADER.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

AK Steel Corporation appeals from the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granting summary judgment that its U.S. Patent 4,800,135 was not infringed by Sollac and Ugine (collectively, "Sollac") and that certain claims of its U.S. Patent 5,066,549 are invalid. AK Steel Corp. v. Sollac,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases