1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.Rptr.2d
  4. 130 Cal.Rptr.2d
  5. 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 26 (2003)
 

CAMARILLO v. VAAGE

No. D039057.

130 Cal.Rptr.2d 26 (2003)

105 Cal.App.4th 552

Claudia CAMARILLO, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert F. VAAGE, et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

Review Denied April 16, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The Loftus Law Firm and Donald J. Loftus for Plaintiff and Appellant.

White, Noon & Oliver, Daniel M. White, Steven G. Amundson and Harry W. Harrison, San Diego, for Defendants and Respondents.

Certified for Partial Publication.1

HUFFMAN, Acting P.J.

In this case we are required to consider the interplay of Code of Civil Procedure2 section 364, subdivisions (a), (d) and (e), a MICRA notice provision, and section 474, respecting the naming of Doe defendants, on the issue of whether the section 364 requirement of giving notice of intent to commence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases