Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The defendant's claim that he was not properly served with the summons and complaint is without merit. The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for service pursuant to CPLR 308 (5). The plaintiff made an adequate showing that service pursuant to CPLR 308 (1), (2), or (4) was impracticable (see Solomon v Horie Karate Dojo,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.