1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 323 F.3d
  5. 323 F.3d 989 (2003)
 

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS v. NOVO INDUSTRIES

Nos. 02-1309, 02-1347.

323 F.3d 989 (2003)

SPRINGS WINDOW FASHIONS LP, Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NOVO INDUSTRIES, L.P., Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

February 13, 2003.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy H. Wepner, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz & Mentlik, LLP, of Westfield, New Jersey, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was John R. Nelson. Of counsel was Scott E. Charney.

James H. Riley II, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P., of Houston, Texas, argued for defendant-cross appellant. With him on the brief was William P. Jensen.

Before MAYER, Chief Judge, BRYSON, and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Springs Window Fashions L.P., Shade-O-Matic Ltd., and Manor Tec, Inc., (collectively, "Springs") appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin granting the motion of Novo Industries, L.P., for summary judgment of noninfringement of United States Patent No. 6,178,857 ("the `857 patent"). Novo cross-appeals the grant of summary judgment dismissing its counterclaims of tortious interference and disparagement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases