Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellants' original answers did not give sufficient notice of the transactions or occurrences which provide the basis of the cross claims asserted in their amended answer, as required by CPLR 203 (f), in order to avoid dismissal based upon the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations (see MacDonald v Windfield Bus. Papers,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.