MATISKO v. MATISKO

No. 5D02-1238.

834 So.2d 405 (2003)

Robert J. MATISKO, Appellant, v. Wanda E. MATISKO, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

January 17, 2003.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Matisko, Fern Park, pro se.

Paula Pratt and James E. Cheek, III, of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee.


PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband's failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases