Petitioner challenges the October 2001 denial of his request to participate in a temporary work release program. Because petitioner reapplied for participation in the temporary release program in 2002, following which his application was again denied, this appeal from the earlier, thorough and well-reasoned decision of Supreme Court is now moot (see Matter of Dixon v Struna,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.